What should a counselor avoid when evidence suggests potential harm from a technique?

When evidence suggests that a particular technique may cause potential harm, it is imperative for a counselor to prioritize the well-being and safety of their clients. Utilizing a technique despite knowing that it may pose risks dismisses ethical responsibility and contradicts the fundamental principle of “do no harm.” Counselors are trained to make decisions based on evidence and the best interests of their clients. Ignoring these signs by proceeding with a harmful technique undermines the therapeutic relationship and can lead to detrimental effects on the client's mental health.

Although other options focus on essential practices within counseling, such as informing clients of risks, consulting with colleagues, and documenting requests, they do not address the core issue of engaging in practices that could be harmful. Focusing solely on ensuring that clients are aware of risks or documenting decisions does not justify proceeding with a technique that has potential for harm. Therefore, the correct stance is to avoid using the technique altogether in the face of evidence suggesting possible adverse effects.