What action should a counselor consider if documenting boundary extensions shows potential harm to the client?

In situations where documentation of boundary extensions indicates potential harm to the client, demonstrating an attempt to remedy the harm is essential to uphold ethical standards and prioritize client welfare. The counselor has a responsibility to address any implications that could negatively affect the therapeutic relationship or the client’s progress. Taking action to remedy the harm shows that the counselor is committed to rectifying the situation, maintaining a professional standard, and fostering trust.

This approach aligns with the ethical obligations outlined in the ACA Code of Ethics, which emphasizes the duty to protect the client’s well-being, making it crucial for the counselor to respond proactively. By remedying the harm, the counselor not only acts in the best interest of the client but also takes responsibility for their actions, demonstrating integrity and professionalism in practice.

Ignoring the documentation would disregard the potential risks to the client, while limiting communication with the client could exacerbate issues rather than resolve them. Seeking new clients would divert attention away from the obligation to care for current clients, indicating a lack of accountability. Thus, taking steps to remedy the harm aligns with ethical practices and prioritizes client welfare.